Expert Video

Steve Hurley interviews Nina Hargus, VP of Global Services at EMC Corporation on some of the difficulties in enabling the channel to sell solutions

Defining a "Solution"

"Solutions" is one of those slippery words that can mean anything and everything. In the context of B2B companies, however, the term has taken on a specific meaning.  A council of leading solutions marketing professionals, sponsored by ITSMA, developed the following definition:

"A solution is a combination of products, services, and intellectual property focused on a specific business problem that drives measurable business value."

While we like and agree with this definition, we believe that it's missing s few important elements, so here is our definition:

"A combination of products, services, and intellectual property focused on a specific business problem or opportunity that drives measurable business value and can be significantly standardized. The solutions components can be from either the vendor and one or more partners, and the solutions implementer can be the vendor, the partner, the customer itself, or a combination of the three."

It's a bit longer, and doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, but we nevertheless have found that it clicks with both buyers and sellers given its emphasis on solving specific business problems with measurable business value.  Also, the value is determined by the amount of the solution that is delivered by each of the parties involved in creating the solution. Understood as such, the word "solution" can get beyond the hype and provide important direction to business strategy and operations.

Search our Website
Connect With Us
Download Free Report

Solutions Marketing LinkedIn Community

resources

   

 

 

« You'll always struggle creating solutions, unless... | Main | We've launched! »
7:49PM

Is selling solutions a contradiction in terms?

I don't know how many millions B2B companies have invested in "solution selling" programs, but it's an enormous number -- and of course Solutions Insights will happily help your sales team do a better job in this area, too.

But I really wonder if the whole idea of "selling solutions" is a contradiction in terms.

We all know that the hard sell doesn't work when it comes to high value solutions. Instead, sales people steeped in solution selling methodology understand that they need to find out the customer's pain points, demonstrate expertise in those areas, and identify potential "solutions" to the customer's problem. It's much easier said than done, of course, but the theory has held sway for years and enriched a great many sales consultants and training houses along the way.

In today's B2B markets, though, it's increasingly difficult to sell anything at all. I don't mean that business buyers aren't buying. Certainly they're spending less, and looking for reasons not to buy. But they are absolutely still spending lots of money on products, services, and solutions.

What I do mean is that sales people are more and more playing a secondary support role rather than one that is front and center.

Business buyers today have access to endless amounts of information, reviews, analyses, references, peer communities, and free demonstrations for just about any solution they might consider buying -- and often without the sales person even being involved. In this context, sales people can and do play a critical role in facilitating the buying process by providing information, making introductions to subject matter experts, arranging briefings and demos, and so on. But the key words here are "facilitating" and "buying" which are quite different than "selling."

This is more than semantics. For today's sales organization, we're talking about a different role, personality, skill set, and compensation scheme. And we're talking about a role that is increasingly reactive to buyers reaching out for information and conversation when they want it rather than proactive in cold calling prospects to set up meetings and sales presentations.

If I'm right, the implications for sales organizations (and marketing organizations) go beyond simply better targeting, more training, updated compensation schemes, and more useful collateral. We need to be thinking more fundamentally about how we organize marketing and sales, how we define their roles and missions, and how we work with customers and prospects. A world where there is buying but not selling is a new world indeed.

Or maybe I'm going too far. What do you think?

Photo credit: Lorri37

 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>